26 November 2024
European Society Strikes Back
“This is a frontal and deep attack against the … European society.” With this remarkable statement the Commission has started the “largest human rights battle in EU history”: the infringement proceedings against the Hungarian anti-LGBTIQ* law. The Commission claims that this law breaches the internal market, the Charter rights and the Union’s common values enshrined in Article 2 TEU. The “mega hearing”, which took place on 19 November 2024, is now facing its ultimate test: can the Member States’ compliance with Article 2 TEU be reviewed before the Court of Justice? Continue reading >>
3 
22 November 2024
Die stille Mehrheit hat ihre Stimme gefunden
Fünf Fragen an John Morijn und Luke Dimitrios Spieker Continue reading >>22 November 2024
The Silent Majority Has Found Its Voice
Five Questions to John Morijn and Luke Dimitrios Spieker Continue reading >>
0
22 October 2024
Kein Mut zur Lücke!
Der jüngst eingebrachte Gesetzentwurf zum besseren Schutz des Bundesverfassungsgerichts stellt einen wichtigen Schritt dar. Allerdings klafft weiterhin eine große Lücke in diesem Schutz. Das Wahlverfahren sowie die 2/3-Mehrheit für die Richterwahl, die Senatsmehrheiten für gerichtliche Entscheidungen und die Gesetzeskraft bestimmter Urteile verbleiben im Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz und damit dem Zugriff einer einfachen Mehrheit im Bundestag ausgesetzt. Auch wenn politische Mehrheiten für eine weiterreichende Grundgesetzänderung nicht aufzubringen sind, besteht gleichwohl ein schonender Weg, um das Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz stärker abzusichern: ein Zustimmungserfordernis durch den Bundesrat bei Änderungen des BVerfGG. Continue reading >>
0
09 October 2024
Dismissing the Genuine Link by Disregarding Constitutional Principles
The struggle over the Maltese investment citizenship scheme is probably one of the fiercest debates of EU constitutional law. The conflict revolves around the question of whether EU law contains requirements for the acquisition of Union citizenship and whether these requirements consist in a “genuine link” between the respective state and individual. The recent Opinion by AG Collins provides us with an extremely narrow and astonishingly one-sided view. In particular, he seeks to make us believe that there are no sound ways to anchor a genuine link requirement in EU law. Martijn van den Brink finds it “hard to disagree with the Advocate General”. Respectfully, I disagree. Continue reading >>26 June 2024
The Lighthouse of EU Law Shines on the Polish Constitutional Tribunal
Last week, legal scholars from all over the world met in Freiburg at the ConTrans conference. On the one end of the spectrum, scholars like Woijcech Sadurski advocated for a revolutionary approach, simply dismantling the current Tribunal and re-building it from scratch. On the other end stands Adam Bodnar, who stressed the importance of legality in the transition process. In my view, EU law shines a possible way ahead – it can justify disregarding the Tribunal’s decisions and empower ordinary courts to assume the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. Eventually, this would lead to a decentralised constitutional review. Continue reading >>
0
18 March 2022
How to Set Aside Hungarian Cardinal Laws
The anti-Fidesz coalition could win the next Hungarian elections. That, however, is only one step on a long path back to a full democracy. Fidesz has skilfully entrenched its power, personnel, and policies. How could a new majority overcome this, align the Hungarian legal order with European standards, and allow for democratic governability? Continue reading >>
0
10 December 2021
Restoring the Rule of Law Through Criminal Responsibility
To restore an independent judiciary and – in a broader perspective – the rule of law, it would suffice to remove the central perpetrators from the judiciary. To achieve this aim, we plead for the criminal responsibility of those judges who severely and intentionally disrespect EU values. Establishing their criminal responsibility in fair proceedings would then justify – in fact: require – their removal from office. Continue reading >>26 March 2020
The Court gives with one hand and takes away with the other
On March 26, the CJEU released a surprising – if not to say disappointing – judgment on the Polish system of disciplinary measures against judges. While the Court confirmed the ample material scope of Article 19(1)(2) TEU, it simultaneously restricted the procedural possibilities to remedy infringements via the preliminary reference procedure. Continue reading >>30 May 2019
Commission v. Poland – A Stepping Stone Towards a Strong “Union of Values”?
Commission v. Poland gives the Court not only the opportunity to put ASJP into practice but also to clarify the doctrinal framework for finally addressing the developments in “backsliding” Member States under EU law. This contribution will shed some light on these two uncertainties, suggest ways of how the Court could resolve them and explore the potential repercussions for the EU legal order. Continue reading >>
0