05 April 2024
Access and Benefit-Sharing Isn’t Equity
It is unsurprising that equity has featured so prominently in the Pandemic Treaty negotiations – the Treaty is a direct response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which was characterised by gross inequality between high-income and LMICs. For all the talk at the start of the Treaty negotiation process of equity, of doing things differently in the future, it appears that very little will change. If it works, and there are very good reasons to believe that it will not work, it will at best make sure that a small proportion of vaccines end up where they need to be, and the rest will continue to go to the highest bidder, regardless of need, equity, or justice. Continue reading >>
0 
07 March 2023
The Italian “No Jab, No Job” Law Passes Constitutional Muster
The Italian legal system has known some unprecedented measures during the pandemic, including the lockdown regime, “green pass” system etc. Such measures have been probed by ordinary and administrative judges and by the Italian Constitutional Court (ICC). Notwithstanding some limited corrections, these measures stood up to scrutiny overall. This is also true for COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Now, with three judgments, the ICC dismissed all the challenges against it. Continue reading >>
0
26 May 2022
Partygate, Inquiries, and how not to Learn Lessons in the UK
Responding to public pressure and the criticisms of bereaved families, many states have begun to examine the actions and decisions taken during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public inquiries or parliamentary investigations are an essential step in this examination and can provide lessons to support an effective future response to crisis. In any such investigation, the question of who investigates and what is investigated can be as important as the findings themselves. However, a barrier to learning will be the political pressure not to own up to failures or failings, particularly where it concerns a culture of government or a style of governance still practiced. What this can collectively amount to is a failure to learn: a critical failing where it is not question of if a future crisis arises – but when. Continue reading >>25 May 2022
Abschied von der Verhältnismäßigkeit?
Überraschen konnte der Beschluss des BVerfG zur einrichtungsbezogenen Impfpflicht“ nicht: Die Pflicht, eine COVID-19-Schutzimpfung nachzuweisen, ist verfassungsgemäß. Der Beschluss vom 27. April 2022 führt die Neuausrichtung der Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung fort, die bereits in den Entscheidungen zur Bundesnotbremse vorangetrieben wurde. Continue reading >>15 February 2022
Whatever it takes II?
Mit der Debatte über die Impfpflicht ist es in Deutschland wie mit dem Virus: Sie entwickelt immer neue Varianten. Bis Mitte November 2021 waren praktisch alle dagegen, dann dauerte es nur wenige Tage, und plötzlich waren unter dem Eindruck der vor allem durch die ungeimpften Teile der Bevölkerung rauschenden Delta-Variante ganz viele dafür. Und jetzt? Continue reading >>04 February 2022
The Taming of the Czech Executive
On Wednesday, 2/2/2022, the Czech Supreme Administrative Court quashed an executive measure imposing the so-called “2G rule” (geimpft/genesen, i.e. vaccinated/recovered) on selected service providers, most importantly restaurants and hotels. While the vocal opponents of vaccination celebrate the ruling and refer to the judiciary as ‘the last bastion of freedom’, there was some major misrepresentation of what the SAC has (not) established in this very viral judgment. The executive measure under review was not quashed because ‘the state must not force people into voluntary vaccination’, nor because ‘kicking the unvaccinated out of pubs is illegal and must stop’. Since the only legal argument for quashing the measure was the lack of competence of the Ministry of Health, it seems like there was much ado about nothing. Continue reading >>
0
28 January 2022
Allgemeine Impfpflicht II – und die Abwehr des Subjektiven
Vor einer Woche habe ich einen Blogbeitrag zu „Allgemeine Impfpflicht – ein kleiner Piks, ein großes verfassungsrechtliches Problem“ verfasst. Der Beitrag hat zahlreiche Reaktionen ausgelöst. Teils beruhen diese auf Missverständnissen oder einer ungenauen Lektüre meines Textes. Insbesondere Klaus Ferdinand Gärditz hat mir zu viel Subjektivität, zu starke individuelle Beliebigkeit vorgeworfen – ich hätte mich „verrannt“. Dies gibt Anlass zu einigen Klarstellungen und weiteren Erläuterungen. Continue reading >>24 January 2022
Grundrechtsdogmatik auf dem Jahrmarkt der Wahrheiten?
Selbstverständlich lässt sich über die Verhältnismäßigkeit einer Impfpflicht streiten. Ute Sacksofsky hat dies jüngst auf diesem Forum engagiert getan. Die Argumente, die sie gegen eine Impfpflicht anführt, sind jedoch befremdlich und entkleiden die Verhältnismäßigkeitsprüfung ihrer Rationalisierungsfunktion. Continue reading >>21 January 2022
To Oppose
Freedom of assembly, general orders and boulders thrown by administrative law and hitting constitutional law Continue reading >>21 January 2022